The internet is now succumbing to a crackdown of copyrighted material under the influence of the proposed acts SOPA ( Stop Online Piracy Act) and The PIPA( Protect Intellectual Property Act) with Megaupload shutting down indefinitely under the federal law of United States of America. One would say it is justice, but others say it is a degradation of freedom. Nonetheless it is an insult to those who have sacrificed in the name of freedom; those who seeked knowledge and understanding. With the owner of Megaupload, Kim Dotcom, arrested, who was living in New Zealand at the time, it is now become more obvious that the US is trying through all means to obtain more power, control and influence over other countries.
In the ironic twist of fate, his own site for the SOPA bill has some copyrighted problems of its own. A person called Jamie Lee Curtis Tatete researched deeply into Smith's campaign site . It turns out the images on Smith's site was harder to source which meant the owners was not acknowledged properly Then Tatete found a picture of a "idyllic backwoods scene "was by photographer DJ Schulte. DJ Schulte said the photo was listed as creative commons - anyone could use this image so long as he was credited. But what appears to be is that the site did not. Forbes have described Smith as "hypocritical".{ which precisely true}Because the internet is linked so thoroughly, severing them will be catastrophic as anything can be considered a crime, even the Smith himself can be charged for not crediting the photographer. How can an Act be put forward if the owner contradicts it?
I'm pleased that many big names have opposed to these acts such as Wikipedia- who blackout english version for 24 hours- Google, Yahoo, Ebay, Twitter, including Facebook owner Mark Zuckerberg who wrote this Anti-SOPA massage on his Facebook page: " The internet is the most powerful tool w have for creating a more open and connected world. We can't let poorly thought out laws get in the way if the internet;s development…we will continue to oppose any laws that will hurt the internet," This suggest that this bill is majority unfavored by the public as it is hurting not only the flow of information but also the way the information is being published. Even human rights organisation such as Reporters without Borders, The electronic Frontier foundation and the Human Rights watchs are getting involved inoto opposing the acts.